South Carolina
- South Carolina is one of the few remaining states with no medical cannabis program, relying solely on a highly restrictive low-THC (0.3%) exception for severe epilepsy under Julian's Law (2014).
- Despite approximately 83% of registered voters supporting medical cannabis legalization — including 74% of self-identified Republicans — the legislature has repeatedly failed to pass the Compassionate Care Act.
- In 2018, Black residents were 3.5 times more likely to be arrested for cannabis possession than white residents; seven of the top 20 most racially disparate counties in the U.S. are in South Carolina.
- South Carolina made 38,289 cannabis arrests in 2018 — more than for all violent crimes combined — and possession arrests increased 52.8% between 2010 and 2018.
- Because South Carolina has no citizen-led ballot initiative mechanism, all reform must pass through a historically resistant General Assembly facing entrenched opposition from the Attorney General and SLED.
South Carolina remains a firmly prohibitionist state, categorizing cannabis alongside highly restricted controlled substances with no comprehensive medical or adult-use framework. The state operates under a strictly punitive legal regime in which possession arrests surged counter to national trends throughout the 2010s, systemic racial disparities in enforcement are among the worst in the nation, and the primary political obstacle to any reform is a coalition of state law enforcement and the Attorney General — not public opinion, which overwhelmingly favors change.
Penalties
| Offense | Amount | Classification | Penalty |
|---|---|---|---|
| Simple Possession | 1 oz or less | Misdemeanor | First offense: up to 30 days jail and/or $100–$200 fine; driver's license may be revoked 30 days. Second/subsequent offense: up to 1 year jail and $200–$1,000 fine. [10] |
| Simple Possession | More than 1 oz (no intent to distribute) | Felony | First offense: 6 months to 5 years prison and $1,000–$5,000 fine. Second offense: up to 10 years and $10,000 fine. Third/subsequent: 5–20 years and $20,000 fine. [10] |
| Possession of Hashish/Concentrate | 10 grams or less | Misdemeanor | First offense: up to 30 days jail and $100–$200 fine. Subsequent offenses: up to 1 year and $1,000 fine. [10] |
| Possession of Hashish/Concentrate | More than 10 grams | Felony | Treated as possession with intent to distribute per se; felony penalties apply. [10] |
| Possession With Intent to Distribute (PWID) | Any amount | Felony | First offense: up to 5 years and $5,000 fine. Second offense: up to 10 years and $10,000 fine. Third/subsequent: 5–20 years and $20,000 fine. [14] |
| Trafficking | 10–99 lbs | Felony (mandatory minimums) | First offense: 1–10 years and $10,000 fine. Second offense: 5–20 years and $15,000 fine. Third offense: mandatory 25 years and $25,000 fine. [10] |
| Trafficking | 100–1,999 lbs | Felony (mandatory minimum) | Mandatory 25 years and $25,000 fine. [14] |
| Trafficking | 2,000–9,999 lbs | Felony (mandatory minimum) | Mandatory 25 years and $50,000 fine. [14] |
| Trafficking | 10,000+ lbs | Felony (mandatory minimum) | 25–30 years (mandatory minimum 25 years) and $200,000–$250,000 fine. [10] |
| Cultivation | Fewer than 100 plants | Felony | Up to 5 years and $5,000 fine. [10] |
| Cultivation | 100–1,000 plants | Felony (mandatory minimum) | Mandatory minimum 25 years and $25,000 fine. [10] |
| Cultivation | 1,000–10,000 plants | Felony (mandatory minimum) | Mandatory minimum 25 years and $50,000 fine. [10] |
| Cultivation | 10,000+ plants | Felony (mandatory minimum) | Mandatory minimum 25 years and $200,000 fine. [10] |
| Paraphernalia | Any (no residue) | Civil / Misdemeanor | Civil citation only if no measurable residue present. Presence of any residue triggers possession charges. [14] |
Criminal Justice
| Group | Metric | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Disparity Ratio vs. White residents | 3.5x more likely to be arrested for cannabis possession [5] |
| Black — Disparity Trend | Disparity Ratio over time | 1.8x in 2001 → 2.8x in 2010 → 3.5x in 2018 (widening gap) |
| Black — Pickens County | County-level disparity ratio | 8.36x more likely to be arrested than white residents |
| Black — Greenville County | County-level disparity ratio | 5.25x more likely to be arrested than white residents |
| Black — Charleston (Jan 2020–Jun 2021) | % of cannabis possession arrests | 71.3% of all cannabis possession arrests [20] |
| Black — Charleston Sales Arrests (Jan 2020–Jun 2021) | % of cannabis sales arrests | 81.7% of all cannabis sales arrests [20] |
| Black — Charleston Citation Rate | Citation rate vs. white residents | 9.6x the citation rate for cannabis possession vs. white residents [20] |
Enforcement of cannabis prohibition is arguably the primary narrative of South Carolina's cannabis landscape. The state dedicates vast judicial and financial resources to prosecuting cannabis offenses. In 2018, 89.4% of all cannabis arrests were for simple possession rather than distribution or trafficking. Counter to national trends, possession arrests surged 52.8% between 2010 and 2018. Racial disparities are severe and expanding: Black residents were 3.5 times more likely to be arrested than white residents in 2018, up from 1.8x in 2001. Seven of the top 20 most racially disparate counties in the U.S. are in South Carolina. A 2021 Charleston Police Department audit found Black residents — 21.7% of the population — accounted for 71.3% of cannabis possession arrests. Expungement is available for first-offense possession but requires a 3-year wait, administrative fees up to $250, and is not automatic.
Border Dynamics
| Neighbor | Legal Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| North Carolina | Fully prohibited for adult use. No comprehensive medical program. | Both SC and NC are fully prohibited, eliminating legal cross-border purchasing flow. |
| Georgia | Fully prohibited for adult use. Extremely limited medical low-THC program (HB 1 — possession only, no in-state dispensaries until recent expansion). | Georgia's limited medical program provides no meaningful legal supply; region functions as a consolidated illicit market corridor. |
South Carolina borders North Carolina and Georgia, both of which are fully prohibited for adult use with only narrow medical exceptions. The region therefore functions as a consolidated corridor for illicit market supply rather than a legal cross-border purchasing zone. The state is monitored under the Atlanta-Carolinas HIDTA (established 1995, expanded 2006), which identifies interstate highway networks as the primary trafficking conduit. Cannabis is the most frequently seized substance in the HIDTA's area of responsibility, with DTOs exploiting legal-state supply chains for cover.
Economic Opportunity
- Fiscal Note
- SC Revenue and Fiscal Affairs Office modeled the Compassionate Care Act against Minnesota's medical framework. Projected state tax revenue: $150,000–$165,000 in the initial operational year, scaling to approximately $3.6 million annually by FY 2027-28 (6% state sales tax on medical products). Local option sales taxes would add approximately $52,000 annually. Revenue distribution: 75% General Fund; 10% local alcohol and drug abuse prevention; 5% SLED; 5% medical cannabis research; 3% impaired driving detection research; 2% Department of Education drug safety programs. Annual cost per state inmate: $34,570 (FY 2022-23).[30]
Current economic opportunity surrounding cannabis in South Carolina is constrained to enforcement cost estimates and fiscal projections from proposed reform legislation. The ACLU estimated that 16,669 possession arrests in 2010 cost taxpayers nearly $50 million; given that possession arrests effectively doubled by 2018, civil rights organizations estimate the state currently expends approximately $100 million annually enforcing misdemeanor possession laws (judges, clerks, police hours, solicitors). Felony incarcerations multiply this figure: the SC Department of Corrections reported an annual cost per inmate of $34,570 in FY 2022-23. If the Compassionate Care Act were enacted, official fiscal modeling projects tax revenue scaling to $3.6 million annually by FY 2027-28 — a modest figure reflecting the bill's extremely restrictive design. No credible state-specific illicit market valuation exists, and no job creation estimates have been published.
Political Trajectory
- Active Bills
- South Carolina Compassionate Care Act (S. 53), 2025-2026 legislative session. Championed by Sen. Tom Davis (R-Beaufort) and Sen. Stephen Goldfinch (R-Georgetown). Establishes a heavily restricted medical cannabis infrastructure with qualifying conditions limited to severe debilitating conditions (cancer, MS, epilepsy, PTSD, sickle cell, autism, Crohn's, terminal illness, chronic conditions for which opioids might otherwise be prescribed). Bans smoking flower, home cultivation, and recreational distribution. Requires dispensing only through state-licensed 'therapeutic cannabis pharmacies' with a licensed pharmacist on-site. Jointly overseen by DHEC and the Board of Pharmacy.[27]
- Polling Support
- Approximately 83% of registered South Carolina voters support medical cannabis legalization, including 74% of self-identified Republicans.[1]
- Ballot Initiative
- South Carolina does not have a citizen-led ballot initiative mechanism. All cannabis reform must pass through the state General Assembly.[1]
South Carolina's political landscape is characterized by heavy conservative caution despite persistent bipartisan legislative effort. Senator Tom Davis has led the medical cannabis charge for nearly a decade, making the Compassionate Care Act progressively more conservative to attract reluctant votes. The bill has passed the Senate multiple times but stalls in the House without a floor vote. The primary obstacle is not public opinion — 83% of voters, including 74% of Republicans, support medical legalization — but an entrenched enforcement coalition led by AG Alan Wilson and SLED Chief Mark Keel. Because South Carolina lacks a citizen initiative process, all reform must navigate a legislature that has thus far chosen to protect its enforcement apparatus over the documented will of voters. The realistic trajectory is continued incremental Senate progress with uncertain House prospects absent a significant shift in House leadership or AG posture.
Sources
- ↑ FundCanna — SC Cannabis Loans
- ↑ Lexington Chronicle — AG Calls Marijuana Most Dangerous Drug
- ↑ WLTX — Group Opposing Medical Cannabis Speaks Out
- ↑ ACLU of South Carolina — New ACLU Report (Black People Almost 3.5 Times More Likely to Get Arrested)
- ↑ ACLU of South Carolina — Tale of Two Countries Report
- ↑ South Carolina Attorney General's Office — Official Website
- ↑ NORML — South Carolina Guide
- ↑ West Law Firm — SC Cannabis Law Firm
- ↑ Law Office of Mo Abusaft — Drug Possession Laws SC
- ↑ NORML — South Carolina Penalties
- ↑ South Carolina General Assembly — S.C. Code 44-53-370 (Bill 3110)
- ↑ Lauren Taylor Law — SC Cannabis Laws
- ↑ Galen College — SC Drug Trafficking Penalties 2025 Update
- ↑ Bannister, Wyatt & Stalvey — Cannabis Offenses
- ↑ David Tarr Law — PWID Charges
- ↑ ACLU of South Carolina — It's Time for South Carolina to Change Its Laws
- ↑ Beard Bros Pharms — SC Compassionate Care Act
- ↑ SC Statehouse Report — Hemp Hits Senate Floor
- ↑ South Carolina Attorney General — Official Opinion 9-16-2024
- ↑ ACLU of South Carolina — CPD Bias Audit
- ↑ David Tarr Law — Expungement Guide
- ↑ Axelrod & Associates — SC Expungement
- ↑ Greenville County Solicitor — Expungements
- ↑ SC House Legislative Oversight Committee — Drug Trafficking Threat Assessment
- ↑ Atlanta-Carolinas HIDTA — 2026 Threat Assessment
- ↑ SC Statehouse — Bill 53 History
- ↑ Marijuana Policy Project — SC Compassionate Care Act Summary
- ↑ The Cannabis Business Advisors — SC Medical Legislation Update
- ↑ WFAE — Cunningham Announces Legalization Plan
- ↑ SC Revenue and Fiscal Affairs Office — S. 0423 Fiscal Impact Statement
- ↑ SC Revenue and Fiscal Affairs Office — S. 0150 Fiscal Impact Statement
- ↑ Flowhub — Cannabis Industry Statistics